The POA Board Directors must promise the following:
“We promise to address the Developer’s block/s of votes, and property owners’ election apathy. This combination, gives gated community developers control in all community elections. When it comes to true self-governance, this is Big Canoe’s most important issue.”
As one property owner has said: “Big Canoe’s POA Elected Directors are not elected, they are appointed by the Developer’s block of votes.”
When you have the votes to “appoint” Elected Directors, those who share your point-of-view of Big Canoe’s future, you control the POA Board of Directors. Under this same premise, you can control the selection of the Board President, resulting in absolute control of the Board, and therefore set your own agenda.
Big Canoe’s other elections are also greatly influenced by block voting. For example, the Sconti Restaurant/Amenities election was won by only 46 votes.
The Developer has a personal block-of-votes numbering approximately 100 votes. There is another block-of-votes that numbers well over 200 votes.
Most of Big Canoe elections are very close; a large block-of-votes will decide most of these elections.
The Directors must promise to look for ways to “fairly” (let me say again: fairly) limit block voting and to address property owner voting apathy.
(A “democratic” POA Board will never exist in Big Canoe until the POA Board Directors publicly make and fulfill the Six Promises.)